The DMCB recalls reading that editorial. It wasn’t all THAT exciting. It was similar to many of the other just-say-no-to-government-involvement-in health-care opinion pieces that have been appearing almost daily in that newspaper over the last two months. Mr. Mackey, like many CEOs who want to cover health insurance for their employees, was in favor of a) promoting availability of high deductable plans as well as health savings accounts, b) allowing cross-State border health insurer competition, c) repealing benefit mandates that favor special interests, d) enacting tort reform, e) increasing cost transparency, f) reforming Medicare and (and this was a new one) g) using tax forms to enable voluntary donations to help persons without insurance.
The BLO and its action allies obviously beg to differ. What’s more, they argued that Whole Foods Market’s high nutritional-value products, like good health care, are also being priced out of reach by the same cold market-based logic.
But it won’t be so easy. As anyone who has visited the Hubert H. Humphrey Building in Washington DC or CMS’ Headquarters in Baltimore knows, there are security guards posted at all the doors with metal detectors. What’s more, in Baltimore, you need to be on a preapproved list and your car will be get-out, open the hood, open the trunk and open your luggage searched. Unlike just walking in the front door at Whole Foods for a flash mob with instruments in hand, it’ll be hard to get that tuba through, let alone explaining what you’re up to to a Federal Officer.
And don’t even THINK about pulling any stunts at the Jefferson Memorial.
2 comments:
Well said Brady.
On the other hand, and while I agree with you, CMS' actions, while aimed small, often turn out to be magnified thanks to a byzantine and opague process mixed in with a increasingly hidebound health care system. For example, minor wordings in the Medicare regulations involving prcoess can be interpreted by legions of lawyers and payers into millions of dollars.
Like you, I've met many of the good people at CMS. They are good people. But they are also accountable and from time to time are involved in bad decisions arising out of good intentions. They should be subject to the same noisy, uncomfortable, messy and ultimately democratic 'actions' that have helped make our country great. Right now, in the name of security, it's to easy to conclude they're hiding behind security guards, car searches, bag searches and metal detectors.
I can sympathize with the folks as CMS who don't want to be vulnerable to personal or other types of attacks. On the other hand, there is is something to the notion of being accountable when it comes to using other people's money. In my past in the commercial insurance market, any doctor unhappy with our decision making could get a hold of me personally. The invective could be considerable, but as professionals, you learn to live with it. Sometimes you also learn you made a mistake.
Post a Comment