Tuesday, August 31, 2010
The Non-Linearity of Risk and Disease Burden: A Role for Disease Management
In day-to-day practice, physicians intuitively understand this when they navigate both the high and low ends of the risk curve. When a patient appears with a blood pressure close to 200, they understand it's a potential emergency. When a patient shows up with a pressure just over the guideline target of 140 systolic, they know the individual risk is quite small. Compared to many other issues typically addressed in an average office visit, the DMCB knows physicians can be forgiven for letting modest high blood pressure wait until later. It's not black (out of control) and white (in control) but decidedly grey.
Of course, that's unacceptable in the linear utopia inhabited by quality assurance weenies. Unable to discern the variable value of blood pressure control, these authorities regard all elevated pressures as "equally," bad and bluntly dichotomize them. Any pressure greater than 140 is "bad" while anything lower than 140 is "good."
Which brings up several issues:
1) The physicians' lament about the short comings of commonly used approaches (scroll two thirds of the way down) to assess quality of care may have an element of truth about it.
2) In the "mainframe" one-size-fits-all world of D.C. dominated healthcare, it's difficult to assess the value of various degrees of blood pressure control at the individual patient level.
There is one solution to the physicians' lament. Those patients with a blood pressure just over 140 may be amenable to care management that uses standing orders carried out by non-physicians. By assigning those patients to disease management, physicians will be better able to care for the patients at greatest risk that really need their attention.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment