Naturally, the quizzical Disease Management Care Blog proposes a different metric:
The percent of persons with either 1) "silver" or 2) "bronze" plans who have gone two or more months without paying their insurance premium.
Why, you ask?
1) The silver and bronze plans, because their monthly premium is lower, will attract a disproportionate number of persons who were previously unable to afford health insurance and are now newly insured;
2) According to this just published JAMA article, even if their monthly premiums are fully or partially subsidized, these lower-cost insurance plans cover only up to 60% to 70% of medical expenses. That means cost sharing that can be excess of $6000 and $12,000 for individuals and families, respectively.
As these newly insured persons begin to access health care, high out-of-pocket expenses can lead to two scenarios:
1) Those with subsidized insurance will resent paying anything for a plan that stretches the very definition of "health insurance," or
2) Those with partially subsidized or unsubsidized insurance, because of their mounting bills, won't be able to pay the premium
Either drop-out scenario is very possible. The DMCB isn't aware of any data that describes the normal drop-out rate in low-premium/high out of pocket health insurance plans, but that number exists somewhere. If Obamacare has a higher than expected rate of of drop-outs, that could spell trouble. If the drop-out rate is low, things are going well.
CODA: The image above is an example of an enterprise data dashboard, which is intended to help companies track real time success in achieving specified targets. It's arguably a best management practice and it shouldn't be too much to expect the White House to post an ACA "healthcare" dashboard on their web site. Why not?
Image from Wikipedia